In today's Finnish IT publication online article, the CEO of MySQL (now part of Sun) openly discusses of open source code and the need to keep some of the parts closed. I have discussed in multiple occasions that it is naive to think that fully open source will create a good business if you sole purpose is to be an independent software vendor. If you combine this with services like IBM does, you might make some money. As an entrepreneur, I have studied this topic and even participated in an academic article "Internet-enabled co-production: Partnering or competing with customers?" where my part was to view open source from an entrepreneurial perspective.
The article today in the Finnish Tietoviikko explains that MySQL was in the process of getting listed (IPO) and part of the plan was to have software modules that would be fully closed and this tells me that open source without some proprietary software modules is just fantasy. My recommendation for entrepreneurs is to be very, very careful using open source in core IP (intellectual property) specifically if the company does not understand the different licensing models.
Microsoft Describing Cloud Vision for Partners -- Redmondmag.com
-
Microsoft Describing Cloud Vision for Partners -- Redmondmag.com
Posted using ShareThis
1 day ago

